2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2005 Citroen C3
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 76 more horse power than 2005 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2005 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 305 kg more than 2005 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Citroen C3. (134 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2005 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Citroen |
Model | Tracker | C3 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1398 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 134 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 77 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 995 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 45 L |