2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Fiat Stilo
To start off, 2006 Fiat Stilo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2006 Fiat Stilo. (138 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2006 Fiat Stilo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Fiat Stilo weights approximately 185 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Fiat Stilo (305 Nm) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2006 Fiat Stilo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 Fiat Stilo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | Tracker | Stilo |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1908 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 305 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 82 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 90.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1485 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 58 L |