2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Mazda 6
To start off, 2006 Mazda 6 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2006 Mazda 6. (139 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2006 Mazda 6.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 11 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mazda 6. (210 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Tracker | 6 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2260 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 210 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 87.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 50 L |