2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (120 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 94 kg more than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Tracker 2006 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Chevrolet Mitsubishi
Model Tracker Lancer
Year Released 2004 2006
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 165 HP 120 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 176 Nm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1206 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Consumption Highway 10.7 L/100km 6.9 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 7.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 42 L