2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Toyota Camry
To start off, 2006 Toyota Camry is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Camry. (154 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Toyota Camry. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Camry. (217 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Camry.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 Toyota Camry | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Tracker | Camry |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2360 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 154 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 217 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 88.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 96 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |