2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2006 Volkswagen Caddy
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Caddy is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy. (68 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Volkswagen Caddy weights approximately 232 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy. (140 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Volkswagen Caddy.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2006 Volkswagen Caddy | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Tracker | Caddy |
Year Released | 2004 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 68 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 140 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1532 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 60 L |