2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Alfa Romeo 156

To start off, 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,387 cc (5 cylinders), 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 (174 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 weights approximately 67 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Alfa Romeo 156, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 (385 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2008 Alfa Romeo 156 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Tracker 2008 Alfa Romeo 156
Make Chevrolet Alfa Romeo
Model Tracker 156
Year Released 2004 2008
Body Type SUV Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2387 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 174 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 385 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 84.1 mm 82 mm
Engine Stroke Size 75 mm 90.4 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 18.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Diesel
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1318 kg 1385 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4440 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1750 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1440 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2600 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 6.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 63 L