2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager
To start off, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 760 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager (320 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Chrysler Grand Voyager | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chrysler |
Model | Tracker | Grand Voyager |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 94 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |