2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Honda HR-V
To start off, 2008 Honda HR-V is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2008 Honda HR-V. (122 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2008 Honda HR-V. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda HR-V weights approximately 17 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 77 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Honda HR-V. (144 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Honda HR-V.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Honda HR-V | |
Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
Model | Tracker | HR-V |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1590 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 122 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 144 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1317 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 55 L |