2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Hyundai Elantra
To start off, 2008 Hyundai Elantra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2008 Hyundai Elantra. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2008 Hyundai Elantra.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 37 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Hyundai Elantra. (184 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Hyundai Elantra.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Hyundai Elantra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Hyundai |
Model | Tracker | Elantra |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1973 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 184 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 53 L |