2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler

To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,778 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (202 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 560 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2008 Jeep Wrangler (321 Nm) has 100 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2008 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet Tracker 2008 Jeep Wrangler
Make Chevrolet Jeep
Model Tracker Wrangler
Year Released 2004 2008
Body Type SUV SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2491 cc 3778 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 165 HP 202 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 221 Nm 321 Nm
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1300 kg 1860 kg
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4410 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1880 mm
Vehicle Height 1670 mm 1810 mm
Wheelbase Size 2490 mm 2950 mm
Fuel Consumption 10.7 L/100km 11.2 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.4 L/100km 14.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.8 L/100km 13.1 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 61 L 82 L