2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Koenigsegg CCX
To start off, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 4,719 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 Koenigsegg CCX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (806 HP @ 6900 RPM) has 641 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 120 kg more than 2008 Koenigsegg CCX.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Koenigsegg CCX (919 Nm) has 698 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2008 Koenigsegg CCX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Koenigsegg CCX | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Koenigsegg |
| Model | Tracker | CCX |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | Roadster |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 4719 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 806 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6900 RPM |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 919 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1180 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4293 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1996 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1120 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2660 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 17 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 18 L/100km |
