2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Land Rover Discovery
To start off, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,495 cc, 2008 Land Rover Discovery is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Land Rover Discovery weights approximately 900 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Land Rover Discovery (300 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2008 Land Rover Discovery will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Land Rover Discovery | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Tracker | Discovery |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Body Type | SUV | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2495 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 300 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2200 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2550 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 93 L |
