2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2008 Rover 75
To start off, 2008 Rover 75 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,497 cc, 2008 Rover 75 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Rover 75 weights approximately 235 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 Rover 75 (240 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2008 Rover 75 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2008 Rover 75 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Rover |
| Model | Tracker | 75 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2497 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 80 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 82.8 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1535 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2750 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |
