2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Holden Barina
To start off, 2010 Holden Barina is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Holden Barina. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Holden Barina. (197 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Holden Barina.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Holden Barina | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Tracker | Barina |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 221 Nm | 197 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1650 mm |