2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2010 Holden Commodore is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 195 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Commodore (290 Nm) has 69 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Commodore will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | Tracker | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
| Body Type | SUV | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2491 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 165 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 221 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
