2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Kia Carnival
To start off, 2010 Kia Carnival is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,656 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Carnival is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Carnival (186 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Carnival should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Carnival weights approximately 724 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Carnival (246 Nm) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Carnival will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Kia Carnival | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Tracker | Carnival |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 186 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 246 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 86.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 75 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2024 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2900 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |