2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Kia Sorento
To start off, 2010 Kia Sorento is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Kia Sorento is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 2010 Kia Sorento. (139 HP @ 3800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2010 Kia Sorento. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Sorento weights approximately 765 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Kia Sorento (350 Nm) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2010 Kia Sorento will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Kia Sorento | |
Make | Chevrolet | Kia |
Model | Tracker | Sorento |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 91 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 96 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |