2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Lexus ES
To start off, 2010 Lexus ES is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,500 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Lexus ES is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Lexus ES (272 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Lexus ES should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Lexus ES weights approximately 335 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Lexus ES (344 Nm) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2010 Lexus ES will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Lexus ES | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lexus |
Model | Tracker | ES |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 272 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 344 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1821 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 70 L |