2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2010 Peugeot 408. (110 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Because 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Peugeot 408. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (221 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Peugeot |
Model | Tracker | 408 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 147 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2710 mm |