2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Volkswagen T5
To start off, 2010 Volkswagen T5 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2010 Volkswagen T5. (129 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 2010 Volkswagen T5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 53 kg more than 2010 Volkswagen T5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volkswagen T5 (340 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2010 Volkswagen T5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2010 Volkswagen T5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Tracker | T5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 2459 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 340 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 84 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 75 mm | 95.5 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3410 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 80 L |