2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Audi Q5
To start off, 2012 Audi Q5 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi Q5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi Q5 (237 HP) has 140 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q5 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2012 Audi Q5 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi Q5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Audi Q5 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Audi |
Model | Tracker | Q5 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 237 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4628 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1654 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2807 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 75 L |