2004 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2012 Bentley Mulsanne
To start off, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 6,800 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne (505 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 340 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (165 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1285 kg more than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Bentley Mulsanne (1,018 Nm) has 797 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker. (221 Nm). This means 2012 Bentley Mulsanne will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet Tracker | 2012 Bentley Mulsanne | |
Make | Chevrolet | Bentley |
Model | Tracker | Mulsanne |
Year Released | 2004 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2491 cc | 6800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 165 HP | 505 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 221 Nm | 1018 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1300 kg | 2585 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 5575 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1670 mm | 1521 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 3266 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 10.7 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 96 L |