2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1946 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 58 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1946 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1946 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 190 more horse power than 1946 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1946 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 470 kg more than 1946 Volvo PV 60. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1946 Volvo PV 60. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1946 Volvo PV 60 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
| Model | TrailBlazer | PV 60 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1946 |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 3670 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 85 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1630 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2850 mm |
