2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 880 kg more than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1960 Studebaker Sky Hawk | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Studebaker |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Sky Hawk |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2779 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1300 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2980 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 68 L |
