2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP) has 235 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 890 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | TrailBlazer | Master RR |
Year Released | 2004 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 40 HP |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 75 L |