2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1961 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 249 more horse power than 1961 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1961 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1435 kg more than 1961 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1961 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Chevrolet | DAF |
Model | TrailBlazer | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2004 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 665 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2060 mm |