2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1964 Toyota Crown
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Toyota Crown. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Toyota Crown would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 177 more horse power than 1964 Toyota Crown. (98 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1964 Toyota Crown. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 725 kg more than 1964 Toyota Crown. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Toyota Crown. (200 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Toyota Crown.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1964 Toyota Crown | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | TrailBlazer | Crown |
Year Released | 2004 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 2599 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 98 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 200 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1375 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2750 mm |