2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 67 more horse power than 1967 Jaguar 240. (208 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1967 Jaguar 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 580 kg more than 1967 Jaguar 240. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 73 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Jaguar 240. (300 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Jaguar 240.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
Model | TrailBlazer | 240 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 54 L |