2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1240 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 240 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1967 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 57 L |
