2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1973 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 242 more horse power than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1614 kg more than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 331 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1973 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | TrailBlazer | Fronte |
Year Released | 2004 | 1973 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 356 cc |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 33 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 42 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 486 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1210 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2020 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 30 L |