2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1975 Suzuki LJ 20
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (27 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 336 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20. (37 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Suzuki LJ 20.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1975 Suzuki LJ 20 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Suzuki |
Model | TrailBlazer | LJ 20 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1975 |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 27 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 37 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |