2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1977 Mazda 616
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Mazda 616. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Mazda 616 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 196 more horse power than 1977 Mazda 616. (79 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1977 Mazda 616. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1270 kg more than 1977 Mazda 616. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Mazda 616. (124 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Mazda 616.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1977 Mazda 616 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | TrailBlazer | 616 |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1977 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1586 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 79 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 124 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 910 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1590 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2480 mm |
