2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1980 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (269 HP) has 210 more horse power than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 976 kg more than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1980 Nissan Bluebird. (116 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1980 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1980 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
Model | TrailBlazer | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2004 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1951 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 116 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 2166 kg | 1190 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2530 mm |