2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1981 Fiat Ritmo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Fiat Ritmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Fiat Ritmo would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP) has 194 more horse power than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1180 kg more than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Fiat Ritmo. (127 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Fiat Ritmo.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1981 Fiat Ritmo | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | TrailBlazer | Ritmo |
Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 127 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 57 L |