2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1981 Skoda L
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Skoda L. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Skoda L would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 231 more horse power than 1981 Skoda L. (44 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1981 Skoda L. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1275 kg more than 1981 Skoda L. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 299 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Skoda L. (74 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Skoda L.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1981 Skoda L | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | TrailBlazer | L |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1044 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 74 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 8.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 825 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 38 L |
