2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1982 Toyota Sprinter
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Toyota Sprinter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Toyota Sprinter would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Sprinter. (94 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Sprinter. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1125 kg more than 1982 Toyota Sprinter. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Sprinter. (150 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Sprinter.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1982 Toyota Sprinter | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Sprinter |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1588 cc |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 94 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 975 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4260 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2410 mm |
