2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (158 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Ranger |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1983 |
| Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 3998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4690 mm |
