2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1986 Mazda 929
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 1986 Mazda 929. (89 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1986 Mazda 929. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1097 kg more than 1986 Mazda 929. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Mazda 929. (160 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Mazda 929.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1986 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | TrailBlazer | 929 |
Year Released | 2004 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 160 Nm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2620 mm |