2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1992 Mazda Eunos
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1992 Mazda Eunos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1992 Mazda Eunos would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (138 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 1992 Mazda Eunos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 870 kg more than 1992 Mazda Eunos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1992 Mazda Eunos. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 206 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Mazda Eunos. (167 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Mazda Eunos.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1992 Mazda Eunos | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | TrailBlazer | Eunos |
Year Released | 2004 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 69.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1230 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1710 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |