2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero would be higher. At 4,157 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1316 kg more than 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1995 Mitsubishi Pajero | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
Model | TrailBlazer | Pajero |
Year Released | 2004 | 1995 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4157 cc | 1100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 269 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2166 kg | 850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1910 mm | 1400 mm |