2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer (276 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 897 kg more than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer. (353 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 1996 Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mitsubishi |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Lancer |
| Year Released | 2004 | 1996 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 1997 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 353 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 2247 kg | 1350 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1400 mm |
