2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 1998 Mazda RX-7

To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda RX-7. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda RX-7 would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda RX-7 (280 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda RX-7 should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 977 kg more than 1998 Mazda RX-7.

Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1998 Mazda RX-7. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda RX-7. (315 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda RX-7.

Compare all specifications:

2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer 1998 Mazda RX-7
Make Chevrolet Mazda
Model TrailBlazer RX-7
Year Released 2004 1998
Body Type SUV Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 4163 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 275 HP 280 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 373 Nm 315 Nm
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Number of Seats 7 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 2247 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1920 mm 1240 mm
Wheelbase Size 3280 mm 2430 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 95 L 76 L