2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2000 Jaguar F-Type
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Jaguar F-Type would be higher. At 4,194 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Jaguar F-Type is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Jaguar F-Type (390 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Jaguar F-Type should accelerate faster than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 380 kg more than 2000 Jaguar F-Type.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Jaguar F-Type. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2000 Jaguar F-Type | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Jaguar |
| Model | TrailBlazer | F-Type |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4163 cc | 4194 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 390 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6100 RPM |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2180 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4100 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1100 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2390 mm |
