2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2000 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 930 kg more than 2000 Nissan Bluebird.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2000 Nissan Bluebird | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Nissan |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Bluebird |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1499 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 1170 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1450 mm |
