2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2001 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Jeep Wrangler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Jeep Wrangler would be higher. At 4,163 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 183 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Jeep Wrangler. (190 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Jeep Wrangler.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2001 Jeep Wrangler | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | TrailBlazer | Wrangler |
Year Released | 2004 | 2001 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4163 cc | 2501 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 373 Nm | 190 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 98.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 81 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2380 mm |