2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2003 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Holden Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Holden Rodeo would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (145 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 93 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Holden Rodeo. (280 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Holden Rodeo.
Compare all specifications:
| 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2003 Holden Rodeo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
| Model | TrailBlazer | Rodeo |
| Year Released | 2004 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4161 cc | 3494 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 275 HP | 145 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Torque | 373 Nm | 280 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1650 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3060 mm |
