2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2007 Ford E-150
To start off, 2007 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2007 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 49 more horse power than 2007 Ford E-150. (226 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2007 Ford E-150 (388 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. (373 Nm). This means 2007 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2007 Ford E-150 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | TrailBlazer | E-150 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 226 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 388 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 132 L |