2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2007 Mazda RX-8
To start off, 2007 Mazda RX-8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (232 HP @ 8500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Mazda RX-8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 157 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Mazda RX-8. (216 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Mazda RX-8.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2007 Mazda RX-8 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | TrailBlazer | RX-8 |
Year Released | 2004 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1308 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 8500 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 216 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 73 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 85 mm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 10 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 60 L |