2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer vs. 2008 Fiat Palio
To start off, 2008 Fiat Palio is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher. At 4,161 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 185 more horse power than 2008 Fiat Palio. (90 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer should accelerate faster than 2008 Fiat Palio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer weights approximately 1155 kg more than 2008 Fiat Palio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Fiat Palio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer (373 Nm) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Palio. (102 Nm). This means 2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Palio.
Compare all specifications:
2004 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | 2008 Fiat Palio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Fiat |
Model | TrailBlazer | Palio |
Year Released | 2004 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4161 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 275 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 373 Nm | 102 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 70.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 78.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.1:1 | 9.1:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2100 kg | 945 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 3830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1440 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1920 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3280 mm | 2380 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 95 L | 47 L |